IPA IP 2026 Question 73

Topic: Software

A question IPA Japan published in 令和8年度 ITパスポート試験 公開問題 問73, translated into English. ITPEC is based on the same exams.

Which of the following is an appropriate description concerning copyleft in the licenses of OSS (Open Source Software)?

Explanation

Derivatives must be distributed under the same licence — copyleft passes the freedoms of the original OSS on to every modified version.

Copyleft does not give up copyright; it uses it to keep the software free. Anyone may use, modify and redistribute the software, but whoever distributes a derivative work must apply the same licence to it and make its source code available, so the modified version stays open too. The GNU GPL is the typical copyleft licence. Permissive licences such as the MIT and BSD licences have no copyleft: a derivative may be distributed under another licence, even as closed source.

Answer (d)

Why not others:

  • •(a) — copyleft relies on copyright: the author keeps it and sets the licence terms; waiving copyright would put the work in the public domain, where no condition could be imposed
  • •(b) — OSS may be sold, but no OSS licence obliges the copyright holder to charge users, and most OSS is free of charge
  • •(c) — distributing a modified version while keeping the modified source closed is exactly what copyleft forbids; only a permissive licence allows it

Key rule: Copyleft (GPL): derivatives must be distributed under the same licence with their source code; permissive licences (MIT, BSD, Apache) let derivatives change the licence.

Software · AI-written, may contain errors

This question comes from the past questions IPA Japan publishes, translated into English by ITPEC Practice. ITPEC Practice is an independent study tool and is not affiliated with IPA or ITPEC. See the original paper (PDF) or Report an issue.