IPA FE Subject B 2023 Question 6
A question IPA Japan published in 令和5年度 基本情報技術者試験 科目B 公開問題 問6, translated into English. ITPEC is based on the same exams.
Company A runs an advertising production business for broadcasting companies and transportation companies. To improve the efficiency of its human resources operations, Company A decided to consider outsourcing its human resources operations. Figure 1 shows the work that Company A will outsource (hereinafter, work B).
Figure 1 Work B
Company C, a candidate outsourcing contractor, made the following proposal to Company A about work B.
- •Assign dedicated employees who are engaged only in work B.
- •In work B, use the scan function of the multifunction printer shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2 Scan function of the multifunction printer (excerpt)
Before concluding an outsourcing contract with Company C, Company A concluded a non-disclosure agreement. After that, Company A sent a questionnaire to Company C, received the answers, and conducted an assessment of the information security risks in the outsourcing. As a result, the findings in Figure 3 were made.
Figure 3 Findings
Therefore, Company A assessed that leaving the initial settings as they are poses an information security risk to Company A, and that a countermeasure of changing them from the initial settings is necessary.
Answer group
Explanation
A forged email that looks exactly like the printer’s leads an employee to a phishing site — the scan emails all use the published default sender, subject and body, so an attacker can copy them exactly.
Figure 3 says the sender address, subject, body and attachment file name of every scan email are the initial settings, the same whoever scans, and that these settings are published on the vendor’s website. Anyone can therefore write an email that cannot be told apart from a genuine one and put a link to a phishing site in its body. The employees of work B receive such emails daily, and for large files a URL in the body is normal, so they are likely to click it; a fake login page can then collect what they enter, and the prospective employees’ data leak. Changing the defaults removes the look-alike.
Answer (a)
Why not others:
- •(b) — genuine emails taken for spam have nothing to do with the settings being public; identical emails are if anything easier to recognise
- •(c) — the attached PDF is already encrypted with each employee’s key, and encrypting an intercepted copy locks nothing Company A holds
- •(d) — the URL alone does not open server B: Note 1) of Figure 2 requires each employee’s user ID and password, and eavesdropping does not depend on the defaults either
Key rule: A message whose content is fixed and public can be forged by anyone; make genuine messages distinguishable, or the fixed look becomes a phishing template.
Security Scenarios · AI-written, may contain errors
This question comes from the past questions IPA Japan publishes, translated into English by ITPEC Practice. ITPEC Practice is an independent study tool and is not affiliated with IPA or ITPEC. See the original paper (PDF) or Report an issue.